A Business Encyclopedia

Knight’s Theory of Profit

Definition: The Knight’s Theory of Profit was proposed by Frank. H. Knight, who believed profit as a reward for uncertainty-bearing, not to risk bearing. Simply, profit is the residual return to the entrepreneur for bearing the uncertainty in business.

Knight had made a clear distinction between the risk and uncertainty. The risk can be classified as a calculable and non-calculable risk. The calculable risks are those whose probability of occurrence can be anticipated through a statistical data. Such as risks due to the fire, theft, or accident are calculable and hence can be insured in exchange for a premium. Such amount of premium can be added to the total cost of production.

While the non-calculable risks are those whose probability of occurrence cannot be determined. Such as the strategies of a competitor cannot be accurately assessed as well as the cost of eliminating the completion cannot be precisely calculated. Thus, the risk element of such events is not insurable. This incalculable area of risk is the uncertainty.

Due to the uncertainty of events, the decision-making becomes a crucial function of an entrepreneur or manager. If the decisions prove to be correct by the subsequent events, an entrepreneur makes a profit and vice-versa. Thus, the Knight’s theory of profit is based on the premise that profit arises out of the decisions made under the conditions of uncertainty.

Knight believes that profit might arise out of the decisions made concerning the state of the market, such as decisions with respect to increasing the degree of monopoly in the market, decisions regarding holding stocks that might result in the windfall gains, decisions taken to introduce new product and technique, etc.

The major criticism of the knight’s theory of profit is, the total profit of an entrepreneur cannot be completely attributed to uncertainty alone. There are several functions that also contribute to the total profit such as innovation, bargaining, coordination of business activities, etc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Related pages

markup pricesdisinvestment definitiondefine jitmasti definitionmeaning of balloon paymentwhat are the four characteristics of a pure monopolyquota sample definitionsbu objectivesmanpower planning meaningdef of indifferentabc inventory systemmeaning of outlaymeaning of monopoly in economicsmanagement theoristdefine job enlargementcheques definitionstiff competition definitionnational pension system nps indiaconvex curve economicsliquidations definitiondefine truncationdisadvantages of laissez faire leadershipdefinition of reverse repo ratecurrency speculation definitionwhat is meant by payback periodblake and mouton managerial grid pptdefine fashion forecastingoligopoly market examples in indiaindifference curve equilibriumcompulsory convertible debentureexamples of oligopolistic marketsadvantages of salesforce crmelastic demand definition economicsexample of a convenience sampledemand pull inflationexamples of veblen goodsdefine red tapismdelfi methodqueing theorymanagement jargonswhat is forward market hedgedefine the term market segmentationwhat is micro environmental factorssampling distribution of the medianrevenue deficit vs fiscal deficitoperating profit margin ratio formulawhat is sampling variabilitydiminishing utility definitionmodigliani and miller modelcapm model formulatypes of deficit financingdefine delphi methodthe definition of sole proprietorshipformula for acid test ratiodefine demand depositassumptions for pearson correlationdefinition divestiturepolycentric staffingi g2g meaningasset turnover definitionmaximization meaningcost push inflation may be caused bywhat is likert scale with exampledefination of operation researchfrontal attack strategy exampledefine payoutporter's 5 forces templatetraditional banking definitionduality in lpplaissez faire leadership stylelimitations of target costing